Why Some Companies Don’t Get Social Media

By Mark Evans - Thursday, August 5th, 2010 at 8:03 am  

For those of drinking the Kool-Aid, it seems like a no-brainer for companies to embrace social media as a new and different to communicate, market and sell. The number of people using social media and the benefits of getting on the bandwagon appear to be so obvious, any reluctance to at put a toe in the water is puzzling.

Yet, there are many companies still sitting on the sidelines. For whatever reason, they haven’t been convinced yet that social media is worth doing.

In an excellent blog post, Lee Odden said one of the biggest challenges is “most companies are not inherently “social” to begin with”, and that companies struggls to make social media work like traditional tool such as direct marketing, e-mail campaigns, advertising and search engine marketing.

Here are some other major hurdles for companies when it comes to adopting social media:

1. Senior executives don’t use or get social media. If you’re an older, hard-working senior executive, you probably don’t have the time to really check out social media.

It’s something they may have read about in BusinessWeek or seen their children spend hours doing, but blogs, Facebook, Twitter, etc. don’t seem compelling or interesting enough for them to use. Not that there is anything wrong with that, but it is what it is.

2. There is no simple way to measure ROI. If companies are trying to apply traditional ROI metrics to social media, it’s a lot like trying to fit a round peg into a square hole. Social media is a different beast with “hard” and “soft” metrics.

The hard metrics such as Web site visits, leads and sales are easy for executives to understand. The soft metrics such as having stronger relationships with existing and potential customers, improved customer service, a better brand, and being a transparent operation can be difficult to accept when compared with traditional metrics.

3. Many companies cling to belief that if something ain’t broke, don’t fix it. With the global economy appearing to be in recovery mode, many companies have been able to stick with traditional marketing and advertising tools.

Sure, they may be working but it overshadows the reality that social media is quickly emerging as a viable and legitimate vehicle that companies, particularly those focused on the B2C market, need to embrace sooner or later.

4. As Lee Oden also pointed out, many companies have a difficult time trying to understand that social media means they have to change their behaviour.

It means being more transparent and having real-time conversations with customers and potential customers. For publicly-traded companies concerned with disclosure and competitive issues, the idea of allowing employees to talk on public forums is a no-go.

5. The social media ecosystem has done a pretty lousy job of putting the spotlight on social media “success”.

There is no lack of coverage for “lottery wins” as the Old Spice campaign or the video that goes viral but there is arguably not enough focus on stories about companies have enjoyed “normal” success with social media. These companies haven’t made TechCrunch of the cover of AdAge but they have nevertheless been successful in driving new business and engaging with customers.

There are probably lots of other excuses that companies use to not do social media but over time, they will start to lose their effectiveness as social media becomes more engrained as a valuable corporate asset.

What do you think some of the other reasons why companies shy away from using social media?

Tags: , ,

6 Responses to “Why Some Companies Don’t Get Social Media”

  1. Lee Odden says:

    Thank you for sharing your perspectives on what has been a very popular topic. The post you’re referencing has had nearly 1,000 retweets and many times that in visitors in just a few days.

    I think a lot of companies make their investments in things that show a familiar and clear return. Many aspects of the social web are unfamiliar and do not tie into existing marketing and communications infrastructure in terms of implementation, management and reporting.

    The fifth point in your post hits the nail on the head I think. There really hasn’t been a very good job of highlighting case studies. There are lists like http://wiki.beingpeterkim.com with over 1,500 examples of brands using social media and there are plenty of small business social media stories in industry vertical and regional publications, but it’s not enough.

    Thanks again for mentioning the post and I’m looking forward to more discussion on this topic.

  2. One other reason could be that social media requires continuous effort and time to sustain its social(organic/living) face, unlike a tv commercial which appears and disappears. Once there are more than a couple of online pages, it becomes difficult to administer them all at once, keep them updated and neat.

  3. [...] Justmeans has a good post on why CSR directors need to understand social media, while Sysomos talks about why some companies don’t get social media [...]

  4. Good points here! My clients simply don’t have the time to put in to get results… build relationships. They think meeting face to face is still the way to go but clearly online social activity will open them up to new relationships and eventually more business.

    Best,

    Carol
    Carebuzz

  5. [...] Symosos believe it’s about proving ROI, senior management personal SM inexperience, organizations’ anticipated behavior overhauls and lack of demonstrated SM success. [...]

Leave a Reply