Archive for the ‘Events’ Category

Lots of Positive Buzz About Microsoft-Skype Deal

After months of rumors about Skype’s future, Microsoft emerged yesterday as the winning suitor with an $8.5-billion takeover offer. It was a deal that had the mainstream and social media channel abuzz yesterday as reporters, bloggers, analysts and tech watchers chatted about what the deal meant to Microsoft and Skype.

To get a better sense of the amount of activity and the overall sentiment, we used Sysomos MAP to do a quick query: “Microsoft” AND “Skype” over the past two days, which takes into account the mounting speculation the night before the deal was confirmed and the subsequent activity afterward.

Not surprisingly, there has been a flurry of activity over the past two days – 10,351 blog posts, 13,637 news articles and 120,472 tweets. To provide some context from April 8 to May 8 (the month before news of the deal started to trickle out), there were 6,662 blog posts, 2,674 news articles and 634 tweets that mentioned Microsoft and Skype.

Overall, the coverage was overwhelmingly positive with 93% of all activity being positive or neutral, while only 7% was negative.

Within the BuzzGraph, which shows the most active keywords, the leading keyword was “8.5″ (the $8.5-billion that Microsoft) is paying for Skype. There were strong links to “Ballmer” (Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer), “VOIP” and “billion”. It is surprising to see a relatively weak connection between “8.5″ and “Facebook” given Facebook was seen a potential buyer of Skype.

It was interesting to see some activity around “aQuantive”, which was the last major acquisition made by Microsoft. Microsoft  paid $6-billion for the advertising and media company in 2007 after losing out on DoubleClick to Google.

The Microsoft-Skype deal was also a global blogosphere conversation with 21.4% happening in the U.S., 11.7% in the U.K., 9.9% in Italy, 7.6% in Germany and 4.4% in France.

Bin Laden vs The Royals

It’s been a busy week for news, but more importantly, all that news has sparked even more talk in the social media realm. Last week I blogged about the royal wedding and all the talk online that was leading up to the big day. Then, on Sunday a huge story broke about the death of Osama Bin Laden and again I blogged about all the online talk surrounding that. What’s really interesting is that while there was a lot of talk about both stories, one gathered speed as it approached over time, while the other came out of no where and just took off. Let me show you what I mean by using MAP, our social media monitoring and analytics platform.

A look at the past six months across Twitter, blogs, forums and news comparing both topics shows that talk about the royal wedding was ongoing, but saw most of it’s talk come in the days leading up to the nuptials (and right after the “I do’s”). To contrast that, talk about Bin Laden was almost flat for the past six months until the huge spike it saw when the news of his death was announced on Sunday night.

However, when I broke those same stats down into a share of voice pie chart, we can actually see that while talk about the royal wedding was happening for six months, the news of Bin Ladens death managed to overshadow it in a much shorter time.

The news about Bin Laden overpowered the talk of the royal weddings in almost all mediums. The one place I saw a difference was in blogs. A look back to my post last week about the royal wedding showed that it was a continuing topic from the time the engagement was announced until the wedding and blog posts about Bin Laden couldn’t overtake that in such a short amount of time. However, all the news articles, forum posts and millions of tweets about Bin Laden’s death helped to propel it when we looked at over all media. In blogs, the breakdown was 53.5% of the conversation about the royal wedding and only 46.4% for Bin Laden.

Next I decided to look at just the past week. The chart starts the day before the royal wedding, when a lot of the anticipation talk was happening, and goes until May 4th. What’s interesting to note here is how there was a lot of talk about the royal wedding, but it almost completely drops off as soon as people started talking about Bin Ladens death.

When I broke this one down to see the actual share of voice, we can see just how much news about Bin Laden’s death has overshadowed the royal wedding. In the past week, despite it’s head start, the royal wedding only accounted for 27% of online conversation while talk of Bin Laden made up the other 73%.

Lastly, I wanted to compare just who was talking about each of these hot topics. A look at where blog talk was coming from reveals no real surprises. There was an almost even split between bloggers from the US and the UK talking about the wedding, while the US was of course more vested than anyone in talk about Bin Laden’s death.

A look at age demographics reveals some interesting things. First is that younger people (20 and under) seemed to have a lot of interest in the royal wedding while the 51+ crowd did not (or at least they weren’t blogging about it). When we look at blogs about Bin Laden’s death we can see that the 21-35 crowd was doing the most blogging, but the 51+ crowd seemed to be blogging about this topic a lot as well.

Lastly, I broke out our new Twitter gender determination feature to see who was Tweeting about each event. 56% of the tweets we found about the royal wedding came from women, while men seemed to tweet more about Bin Laden (coming in at 64%).

Royal Wedding Tweets:

Tweets About Bin Laden’s Death:

Comparing these two events turned out to be quite interesting. While the royal wedding was known about and talked about for months in advance, we can see that a breaking news story that interested the entire world gained much more talk in a much shorter period of time.

If Prince William and Kate Middleton decided to elope, would we have seen similar spikes in talk rather than how it played out over months?

A Quick Look at Canada’s Federal Election Through Social Media

The following post has been contributed by Nygel Weishar.

Yesterday I had the privilege of working on a virtual team with Mark Blevis (@markblevis), Ellis Westwood (@elliswestwood), and Stephanie Brooks (@stephbrooks_) where we conducted some comprehensive analysis regarding social media traffic on the 41st Canadian Federal Election (#elxn41). Down here in Toronto, command central was nothing short of an apartment, two laptops, and a flurry of notes. Up in Ottawa my accomplices were working out of the Canadian Press headquarters.

Throughout the afternoon we collaborated, generating real time reports, and furthermore refining our criteria for what we would define as legitimate election conversation (as anyone who’s conducted SM monitoring knows: clean data is imperative). That being said, we’re currently swimming in data and are just trying to remain calm regarding all the fun we’re going to have pulling it apart. So for today, I’ll present some high level stats with the promise that there is more juicy stuff to come.

In terms of election conversation volume, we saw a pretty consistent Conservative majority hovering around the high 30% range all day. A steady second place was held by the NDP with a volume hold of about 33%. Liberals at 16% while the BLQ and GPC frequently traded somewhere between 5-8%.

Come the end of the day (when riding announcements were becoming final), we saw a pick up in BLQ and Liberal chatter, which unfortunately for them was due to their poor performance at the ballots. Below we have the overall day’s share of voice distribution for the five main parties in the election.

Now the really interesting part is when you compare the overall volume of conversation to the reported election outcome numbers coming in from CBC.ca. Further analysis needs to be done, but in this case it seems that the overall volume of conversation may have been pointing to the popular vote outcome. Food for thought…

When we looked at the tone of the conversation regarding positive/negative sentiment, a stronger negative voice was observed. The automated sentiment tool from Sysomos, benchmarked at 88% accuracy, shows us a 39%/61% split for positive vs. negative conversation respectively. Seems that politics are not only portrayed negatively in traditional media sources (ie: smear campaigns, exploiting commercials), but those messages permeate into social media channels as well.

Observing who was talking and in what language, we saw that overall it was a 21-35 year old male dominated conversation. English also was king on the scene with almost 10x the French conversations taking place.

That’s all for now, but as I promised much more post-analysis to come.

Also, thanks again to Sysomos for the incredible technology and the team up in Ottawa, it was a great experience!

How Fast the News Spreads Through Social Media

Unless you have been totally disconnected from any sort of news over the past 12 hours, you’ve no doubt heard that Osama Bin Laden has been found and killed. Barack Obama, President of the United States, made the announcement late last night, but wasn’t the first one to break the story to a lot of people. Most people who are active on Twitter (and who weren’t asleep at the time) first heard the news through the popular social network where it spread like wildfire.

I first saw tweets about Bin Laden’s death start sometime around 10:30pm(EST). At first no one was sure if this was true or just an internet hoax that was taking off, but by about 10:45pm(EST) most of the TV channels had switched to some sort of coverage about it, so I knew it was real. From there, the tweets just kept on coming. By 11:30 Barack Obama had come on TV to address the world and tell us all what had happened.

Around 11:45pm(EST), just as Obama’s address was finishing, I decided to check MAP, our social media monitoring and analytics platform, to see just how much the word had spread through social media. Although I didn’t think to take a screen shot of what I saw, I did tweet out the info I found and it looked like this:

I continued to track the progress of how the talk about Bin Laden exploded throughout the night from the time of the announcement and it went like this:

Midnight(EST):


12:30am(EST):

1am(EST):

2am(EST):

I then had to finally go to sleep, but I woke myself up at 4am(EST) just to see how the talk had progressed with it now being 9am(GMT) in London, meaning that most people around the world would have now heard the news.

4am(EST):

I then went back to sleep and woke up again around 8am(EST) and started tracking the talk again.

8am(EST):

9:30am(EST):

In less than 12 hours since the tweeting began we saw almost 40,000 blog post and news articles and an astounding 2.2 million tweets all talking about Osama Bin Laden. As well, while no surprise that people in the US were talking the most about this event a look at our geo-location map shows us that people all over the world were tweeting about the news.

Some other interesting things that I noticed was that people were making jokes about Foursquare leading to the finding of Bin Laden. As time went on, people started started using Foursquare to check into places associated with the death of Bin Laden. Some people were checking in to the location where Bin Laden was found, while others were checking in to a “Post Osama Bin Laden World”.

By 10am(EST) this morning I was able to find 11,570 tweets that made reference to Foursquare and Bin Laden or were check-in’s tweeted out that were related to Bin Laden.

Just on an interesting side note, to see a little bit more about who was making these tweets, for the first time ever, I’m proud to debut one of our upcoming new features, the gender breakdown for Twitter. This is a new feature to Sysomos which has not been released into the public version of our system yet that uses a library of names to help determine the gender of Twitter users. According to our analysis 63% of tweets about Bin Laden came from males while the other 37% were female. Watch out for this new feature coming soon.

If this event isn’t proof of just how quickly social media can be used to spread news, I don’t know what is.

Where were you when you heard the news? How did you hear the news? Was it through social media? Leave us a comment and let us know.

NFL Draft Social Media Re-Cap

The following post is courtesy of Nygel Weishar.

Leading up to the draft:

Another year of big-tackles, big-wins, and of course controversy has led us to that nail-biting day where we can see who gets drafted into the NFL and where they are going.

We’ve run some analysis here using Sysomos MAP, our social media monitoring and analytics platform, to try and determine how conversation flows regarding the draft and where buzz is picked up the most. The first thing we should tackle (excuse the pun) is where do people talk about the draft the most? No surprise here, the United States had the most conversation. In terms of channel, as many would expect, Twitter comes in as our top contributor with 42% of the overall conversation over the last year (See graph below). Even in the last 30 days, we have picked up 141,881 tweets regarding the draft, which in turn has reached roughly 175,000,000 people.

The one thing that should be mentioned though is that Twitter’s dominance is not a full time gig. Throughout the rest of the year (aside from the day draft positions were finalized) we see Forums taking the load of most NFL Draft conversations. This points out the fact that Twitter (although amazing for real-time events) may not be the ideal social media channel to carry a discussion or collaborate on ideas with.

Over the last month:

Now let’s change our focus to the last month and more so, the draft outcomes. By now we all know Cam Newton was drafted first, and as you’d expect, the majority (about 22%) of the conversation was regarding him.

The interesting part though, is that the majority of the buzz wasn’t around him. Rather, the heaviest pick up of posts occurred regarding the No. 5 pick: Patrick Peterson.

Even though it wasn’t totally expected, not a lot of people were surprised to see Newton go first.  If you’re unfamiliar with the NFL, and more so the draft process, you may not know this, but over the past few months Peterson has been the top prospect for a lot of NFL clubs.

When Arizona selected Peterson as their first pick, they passed on a bigger team need (quarterback) to take the best deal still available. This unexpected action resonated with a lot of NFL fans and had them talking more about this decision as opposed to the first selection (which most would assume would be the biggest buzz).  This highlights the adage: “content is king”. People will always talk about anything interesting, but generally choose the most stimulating things to continue conversation and pass around between themselves. First round picks happen every year, but shake-ups around expectations and outcome so early in the draft traditionally don’t.

The take home: What we find is traditional media in general pushes the main or most intuitive event, while social media points to the underlying or more interesting stories taking place. That being said, we’ll take this opportunity to thank Arizona for keeping us on our toes.

Until next year.

Everyone’s Talking About The Royal Wedding

Unless you’ve been hiding under a rock lately, I’m sure that you’ve heard about the big upcoming day. Yes, I’m referring to the royal wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton that will be occurring on Friday. Even if you didn’t want to hear about it, I’m sure that you did anyways because the nuptials seem to be being talked about everywhere and social media is no exception.

Using MAP, our social media monitoring and analytics platform, I decided to take a look at all of this online talk. In the last six months our system was able to find 142,665 news stories, 195,713 blog posts, one million tweets and even 116,482 forum posts talking about the royal wedding.

What was interesting was the spread of how much talk was happening and when. In the blogosphere our popularity chart shows that there was a small burst of talk when the engagement was first announced on November 16th. From there talk about the wedding seemed to fuel a fair bit of conversation until about two weeks ago when posts really seemed to pick up. The chart for online media looks very similar to the blogs.

However, if we look at Twitter you can see that there was a big burst in talk when the engagement was announced and then it fell off the radar until very recently.

Also interesting was when I found out where all these blog posts were coming from. Surprisingly, the majority of blogs mentioning the royal wedding were coming from the United States (33.4%), who are not part of the Monarchy, while the UK only held 29.2% of the conversation.

When I looked who was writing all of these blogs I found that the 21-35 year olds seemed to care the most about the royal wedding with 44.8% of the conversation, but people of all ages seemed to be talking about it. I was also surprised to find that both men and women were talking in even amounts about the wedding.

What did separate the two genders was how they were talking. A look at our sentiment comparison shows that women had more negative things to say at 18% (compared to men at 15%) while men were saying more positive things about the wedding at 48% (compared to women at 37%).

Looking at our word cloud to see just what all the talk was about, we can see that the most talked about things in the royal wedding are of course the bride and the groom, Prince William and Kate Middleton. We can also pull out of the cloud that people were talking about how Kate is now becoming a “princess”. People are also talking about “watch”ing and “read”ing about the wedding. And, what wedding talk would be complete without talking about the “fashion”, “style” and, of course, the “dress”?

Were you one of the people contributing to this conversation? Are you going to be tuning in to the wedding on TV or streaming on the net? Let us know in the comments.

Will Canada’s Election Be Won Using Social Media?

In  2008 when Barack Obama won the US presidential election, a lot of folks said that it was because of his and his team’s embrace of social media. The Obama campaign reached out to millions of people using social mediums like Twitter and Facebook. Some even say that his campaign helped bring social media to the attention of a lot of people who had never thought anything of it previously.

Last Friday, an election was called for Canada and already people are saying that it is going to be a “social media election.” Essentially, people seem to think that whichever Canadian political party can make the best use of social media will have this election in the bag. Whether that will be the case or not still remains to be unseen, but we can see already that people are using social media to talk about the election.

Using MAP, our social media monitoring and analytics platform, we took a look at the online chatter over the past five days since the election was called. In the past five days our system found almost 2,500 blogs, 10,000 online news articles, 2,600 forums posts and 72,000 tweets coming from Canada mentioning the election. Those tweets had a possible reach of 70.8 million impressions. Not bad for a country of 33 million.

Our popularity chart shows just how much talk was going on each day by medium. We can see that the day of the election announcement brought the most attention to the subject. The following days show less chatter about the election, but not a huge drop off.

A look at the demographics of Canadians talking about the election online shows that aside from the under 20 population, all ages seem to be talking about the election equally. Both 21-35 and 35-50 year olds hold 33.3% of the conversation respectively, with the 51 and over crowd right behind them at 31.3%. However, while age distribution appears to be fairly even, there seems to be three times more males talking about the election than females.

A break down of Canadian provinces shows that a majority of election talk is coming from Ontraio, Canada’s most populated province and also the home of it’s capital city Ottawa.

Looking at our buzzgraph, we can see that talk for the past five days seems to be mainly about the candidates that will be running. We can see mentions of the big political parties the Conservatives, the Liberals, the NDP and Bloc Quebecois along with their respective leaders Stephen Harper, Michael Ignatieff, Jack Layton and Gilles Duceppe.

Next, we decided to compare Canada’a three largest parties the Conservatives, Liberals and NDP to see which party was getting the most attention. Here, the Liberals appear to be the most talked about party so far.  The Conservatives, who are currently in power, started with more talk than NDP but the NDP has since taken the lead in social mentions.

When we looked at how sentiment panned out across the three parties we found that all three seem to be in an almost dead even race. Currently the NDP holds the most positive sentiment at 50%, but the Liberals and Conservatives are not far behind at 48% and 47%. There also was not much difference in negative sentiment with the NDP at 20%, the Liberals at 22% and the Conservatives at 21%.  While the Liberals are ahead in overall mentions, sentiment shows that there doesn’t yet seem to be a clear favourite or most disliked party.

Lastly, we pulled up word clouds for each of the parties. Again we see talk that resembles just the beginnings of an election. Lots of talk about the parties themselves and their leaders. However, with bit.ly being one the larger words in the Liberals word cloud we can say that more links are being shared regarding them than the other parties. As well, the NDP word cloud shows that they are talking a lot about their party leader, Jack Layton, who’s name appears larger than any other party’s leader in their word clouds. Also, we see the NDP discussing the upcoming debates. While these word clouds don’t show much insight now, it will be interesting and valuable to see how each party’s word cloud changes as the election race continues.

Liberals:

Conservatives:

NDP:

Canada is still in the very early stages of it’s election process, but the internet is already buzzing about it. Social media will almost undoubtedly play a large role in how Canadians talk about the election amongst one another, but it’s hard to say if it will play a large role in propelling one candidate or party ahead of the others. For more interesting coverage of the Canadian election check out Mark Blevis’ blog where he is working with the Canadian Press and using Sysomos to follow the election through social media.

March Means March Madness

When march rolls around college basketball fans goes nuts. Every March brings around the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament, which more commonly is known as March Madness. The tournament pits the top 64 college basketball teams against each other to prove which one is the best. Using MAP, our social media monitoring and analytics platform, I decided to take a look at the mad buzz around March Madness.

While the actual tournament started on March 17th, I decided to first look at all the buzz online since the beginning of the month. I found over 140,000 blog mention, 277,000 forum posts and almost 135,000 news stories and 627,000 tweets.

While that seemed like a lot of mentions of “March Madness” and “NCAA”, I decided to look at the same queries from the start of the tournament a week ago. In one week I found 56,000 blog posts, 55,000 news stories, 122,000 forum posts and 306,000 tweets. That means that almost half the tweets about the basketball tournament happened in the last week alone.

Looking at the popularity of our terms across all mediums, we can see a real spike around the 17th when the tournament started. Since then the mentions seem to have started wained off. Perhaps this is due to the excitement of the tournament starting, but then everyone only talking when their team is playing.

Looking at some demographics of who has been talking since the tournament started, the results I found were very unsurprising. A look at the ages of the people talking about March Madness seems to be mostly dominated by those around the college age and graduates whom would still feel an attachement to their alma mater. As well, I wasn’t surprised to see that males are dominating the conversation.

While the NCAA basketball tournament only includes teams from schools around the United States, the tournament seems to have captured the attention of the whole world. A look at our heat map showing where tweets about the tournament are coming from shows people from all corners of the world cheering on their favourite school team.

Pulling up our buzzgraph, which shows the words most used in conjunction with our serach terms, I found that talk seems to be all over the place. With “basketball” and “tournament” being the center of most conversation, the rest of the conversation seems to be about specific teams, like the “Bulldogs” or the “Wildcats”, and players who seem to stand out, like “Jimmer” who seems to be the 3-point king.

Lastly, I thought it would be interesting to compare buzz about each of the top seeded team from each bracket; The Duke Blue Devils, Ohio State Buckeyes, Kansas Jayhawks and Pittsburgh Panthers. Pittsburgh has been knocked out of the tournament after the second round, but all three of the other top seeded teams have advanced into what is known as the Sweet Sixteen.

Both Ohio State and Duke seem to have the most talk about them happening online. Although their popularity seems to happen at different times. Ohio seemed to see a big spike in conversation before the tournament even started, while Duke had a large spike in conversation after a close game against Michigan.

When I looked at the share of voice between all the teams we can see just how close Duke and Ohio State are in terms of people talking about them. Ohio State owns 32% of the conversation while Duke owns 31%. Pittsburgh has the lowest with 12%, but that can perhaps be due to them getting knocked out while the other teams are still in the tournament.

Finally, I looked at the sentiment surrounding each team. From these results I think it’s fair to say that Ohio State is seen as the favourite with 44% of the conversation about them being positive and only 20% negative. Duke, on the other hand, while having a large part of the conversation, seems to be split on how they have been doing and how they will actual do, with their positive and negative sentiment dead even at 31% each. None of the teams seem to have too much negative sentiment around them with Kansas only having 22% and Pittsburgh having 27% despite being knocked out.

Looking at these comparisons, I think it’s safe to say that Ohio seems to be the front runner in the eyes of the online March Madness fans. With Ohio leading both in the amount of conversation and in positive sentiment, it seems that the social web seems to favour the Buckeyes to win. While only time will tell what will actually happen, I’m going to call the official social media predication as a tournament win for Ohio.

Who do you think is going to walk away the winner? Let us know in the comments.

What Happened at SXSWi?

I just finished attending my first ever South by Southwest Interactive Conference and it was an experience I will never forget. Thousands of people that work in digital professions such as digital agencies, web developers, app developers and others, descended on Austin for five days of learning and fun. I can say now that the learning that happens in sessions is only part of the experience. Some of the greatest things that came from my experience was meeting new people and having really interesting discussions with them in the hallways and parties.

Earlier this week, Mark Evans wrote a post looking at what talk was coming out of the conference halfway through. Now that the conference has come to a close, I decided to look back at all five days using MAP, our social media monitoring and analytics platform, and found a few different results than earlier in the week.

To get an overview of just how much talk was happening these five days I pulled up an activity summary. I was able to find nearly 1,800 blog posts, 540 news articles, 87 forum discussions and over 51,500 tweets mentioning “SXSWi”.

Walking around the convention center I met people from all around the world that had come to Texas just to attend this conference. A look at our Twitter geolocation map to see where all the tweets from the conference were coming from shows just how far and wide people came from to attend.

Not only did I meet people from all over the world, but also people of all ages that were interested in learning more about our digital world. While younger professionals between the ages of 21-35 seemed to be the majority at 52.3%, we can see from the pie chart that the digital world doesn’t only attract younger folks.

As well, conference attendees from numerous industries had come to learn how they could best use digital ideas and practices to help benefit them.

Looking at the talk from blogs in our buzzgraph, which shows the words most used in conjunction with our search term, we can see that people were writing about a lot of the new technologies, applications and ideas that were being shown off around the convention.

A look at the buzzgraph from Twitter shows that people were tweeting more about their experiences. While Mark’s post showed that a lot of Twitter talk earlier in the week focused around the parties that were happening, we can now see that parties has taken a back seat to meeting new people and making interesting finds. We can see that some things people were finding were “startups”, “apps” and the odd geek celebrity sighting.

All and all, South by Southwest Interactive was a great time. I had a chance to meet people I had only talked to through the internet before, as well as people I had never spoken with but will continue to for a long time. As well, the sessions provided some really interesting new ideas, concepts and applications that I’m sure people will be talking about until next years conference.

Were you at SXSWi? Were you not there but trying to follow what was happening there through tweets and blogs posts? Let us know in the comments what you were able to take away from SXSWi.

SXSW….Beyond the Parties

Having never been to the South by Southwest conference (aka SXSW), it’s difficult to get a handle on it. It’s an annual gathering of the leading digital players who gather to socialize/network and, perhaps, take in a few keynotes or panels. It seems that anyone who’s anyone within the digital world has now descended on Austin, Tx.

It’s also the place in which Twitter burst onto the scene in 2007, and where Foursquare (aka the next Twitter) failed to live up to expectations. In many ways, SXSW has become the Super Bowl for the digital industry – a time when people can come together to celebrate, learn about the newest trends and the most exciting start-ups, and, of course, party while obstensibily “working”.

Just out of curiosity, we thought it would be interesting to put the spotlight on the chatter and activity happening at SXSW by using Sysomos MAP and the query “SXSW” or “South by Southwest conference”. From March 11, there have been 14,226 blog posts, 4,367 news articles and 235,558 tweets.

So what are people talking about? Our query produced the following BuzzGraph, which displays the leading keywords on blogs.

Not surprising, Austin is the most active keyword. There are strong links to “festival”, “interactive” (which is the digital part of the conference), “startup”, “Foursquare” and “Groupme”, a group messaging service that unveiled a new feature just before the conference began. Groupme also scored points among SXSW attendees by serving free outside the convention centre.

Within the TwitterSphere, “Austin” was the most active keywords with strong links to “party” (no surprise there!), “rsvp” (again, parties dominate the scene), and “meetup” (aka parties).

To be honest, the results aren’t that surprising given the social nature of SXSW and the fact it is, after all, the weekend when socializing dominates the scene. It will be interesting to see if any news – perhaps the much-speculated launch of a new social network from Google called Google Circles, manages to capture the spotlight.