Posts Tagged ‘ROI’

When Will Social Media ROI Become an Issue?

How important is measuring social media ROI?

It’s an interesting question given a recent survey by Ifbyphone suggested only 26% of marketers believe they can effectively measure the ROI of social media marketing. This compares with 47% for email marketing, 40% for direct mail and 41% for online ads.

Despite the difficulty in measuring social media ROI, the amount of advertising is expected to quadruple to $8.3-billion in 2015 from $2.1-billion in 2011.

It suggests marketers need better tools and approaches to measure ROI, and/or that ROI isn’t an important priority given the social media’s strong growth and the pressure to have a strong presence, regardless of whether the spending actually makes sense.

While ROI is an important and necessary way for companies to measure the effectiveness of their marketing investments, there are questions about how to do given there are hard and soft metrics.

You do have to wonder whether there will be a point soon when marketers get more obsessed with social media ROI.

How much spending will they have to do before the CFO turns to the CMO and asks, “So, what’s the ROI on social media marketing versus the other things we are doing?”.

 

When Will Social ROI Become Mandatory?

According to a recent eConsultancy report, 41% of of more than 1,000 companies and agencies surveyed had “no return of investment figure for any of the money they had spent on social channels as of October 2011″, while only 8% could attribute ROI for all their investments in social media.

Translation: It means far too companies are spending money on social media but don’t have a clue about how well it’s being spent. Meanwhile, less than one in 10 companies were tracking ROI on social media.

If the lack of information about ROI strikes you as strange, it should. In most, if not all business activities, the bean-cutters are focused on ROI to see if the money being well spent, or whether it should be spent on something else with better returns.

But social media seems to be a “special” case so the normal rules of engagement apparently don’t apply. Since social media is so new and there is a lot of experimentation happening, not crunching the numbers to determine ROI is is okay-dokey. We can take a corporate pass on ROI for now because why measure something when we’re still trying to figure out how it works.

No ROI, No Problem? Hardly.

Here’s what I think: that’s a crock (excuse, the language).

What’s particularly ironic about the ambivalence toward ROI is how it runs counter to the importance most companies place on social media monitoring and analytics. One one hand, many companies don’t monitor ROI but they are pretty focused on monitoring what is happening within the social media landscape.

The problem with ignoring, dismissing or not paying enough attention to ROI is companies spend but don’t have any benchmarks to know whether it’s a good or bad thing. Without knowing where you’re coming from, it is hard, if not impossible, to know where you’re going. In other words, if you’re not calculating ROI, you may be wasting good money after bad.

Simply put, any company serious about social media has to measure ROI. It’s as fundamental as having a strategic and tactical plan.

eMarketer put is succinctly:

“In 2012, marketers will need to focus more sharply on hard metrics to gauge digital and social marketing ROI. They will be pushed in this direction by economic and competitive forces, and by rising expectations from internal stakeholders who are more interested in the bottom line than in creative experimentation. Up until now, marketers have been content to dabble in digital and social marketing out of curiosity or peer pressure. But as stakes get higher, these media will have to provide concrete business benefits.”

I couldn’t have said it better myself!

For more thoughts on social media ROI, Mitch Joel has a good read that concludes: “If you can’t measure it, benchmark it and iterate on it it… don’t do it… please.”

Why the Huge Focus on Social Media ROI?

Everywhere you seem to turn these days within the social media landscape, there’s talk about ROI.

What are the metrics that should be used? What KPIs should be considered when measuring ROI?

While it is important to get a good handle on the returns of an investment – be it time, money or people – there seems to be an obsession about social media ROI. Maybe it’s because metrics are a key ingredient of social media when you consider the focus on the number of comments, tweets, RTs, updates, Likes, views, followers, etc.

Since social media can be measured in different ways, it is measured in many ways. In some respects, it’s like baseball, which involves so many statistics that it spawns endless approaches and way to measure just about any team or player.

The strange part about the obsession with social media ROI is how so much marketing spending isn’t measure or can’t be measured – something that was highlighted in a recent comment.

For example, what’s the ROI on a brochure? What about a billboard? How about an ad in a newspaper?

It is possible to measure how many brochures are printed and how many are distributed but you can’t measure how many people read a brochure. In the same way, you can measure how many automobiles pass a particular billboard you can’t measure how many drivers actually look at the billboard.

Despite the inability to accurate measure the effectiveness of a billboard or brochures, billions of dollars are still spent on them by companies as part of their sales and marketing activities.

Another reason for the fascination with social media ROI may be because it’s relatively new. As companies experiment with social media as opposed to spending on other marketing activities, the ability to measure social media ROI could make it easier to justify spending more if the results are encouraging.

This can be particularly powerful within an organization that is reluctant to changes it ways, even though the market dynamics and the competitive landscape may make social media a no-brainer.

Perhaps we’re overly concerned about social media ROI because it is so new. And while it would be wrong to dismiss social media ROI, we may need to be stressed and focused on it.

 

 

 

Is Social Media ROI That Important Yet?

Here’s the thing about social media: the more money companies spend on it, the more that return on investment (ROI) is thrust into the spotlight. After all, it makes complete sense for businesses to get a handle on the effectiveness of their activities.

That is, at least, the theory because there appears to be growing signs that some companies don’t care about the ROI of social media. It’s not that they aren’t interesting in measuring bang for buck but, at this point, they seem content to be active within the social media realm than trying to quantify whether what their doing is working.

This against-the-grain approach to ROI struck me while reading a blog post by Rebecca Pollack Scherr about KFC’s social media activities.

Rick Maynard, manager of public affairs with KFC, said: “We don’t get a lot of pressure to justify [the return on investment]. It’s a very important customer-service element, and that’s enough for us.”

He added that KFC doesn’t spend “a lot of time figuring out the value of a Facebook follower. We see it as 3.5 million people who opted in and feel strongly about the brand, and we owe them the interaction and have a lot of fun doing it.”

Another blow to the importance of ROI came from Brad Shaw, Home Depot’s vice-president for corporate communications and external affairs, who told Fast Company’s Farhad Manjoo the company was “ trying different ways to help us better understand the ‘value’ of a Facebook like….but at this point, revenue is not the intent.”

In the same Fast Company article, Doug Clark, Audi of America’s general manager for social media and customer engagement, said the car maker had no idea how whether a social media campaign launched at last year’s Super Bowl had any impact on sales. ”Today, the equation to measure that doesn’t exist,” he said.

While these are admittedly only three companies, they are major brands making large investments on social media. One would think that determining ROI would be important to justify whether the money being spent is having an impact other than attracting followers and Likes, tweets and updates.

Perhaps the cavalier attitude toward ROI has to do with the fact spending on social media is a drop in the bucket compared with other marketing and sales activities. It means social media is more of an experiment and learning process than an established corporate activity. As a result, ROI isn’t as important as participating and learning first-hand what works and what doesn’t.

The importance of measuring ROI can’t be dismissed because any corporate activity needs to be measured and assessed to see if warrants investment versus putting the money somewhere else. But for all the focus on ROI, the reality may be that it’s still early days for social media and, as a result, ROI isn’t a big priority yet.

At the same time, the ability to measure ROI is still in its infancy. Sure there are dozens of different ways to measure ROI but there is a long way to go before they become rock-hard and established.

For now, social media ROI attracts a lot of attention because companies wants to do know how they are doing beyond attracting attention and activity. But it does seem like there more talk than walk at least for time being.

Is Social Engagement a Myth?

Truth be told, there is a lot of Kool-Aid drinking when it comes to social media. It is hyped as a cure-all, a magic elixir and a silver bullet, which is unrealistic given social media is another channel to establish and build relationships with consumers, albeit in a different way.

As companies spend more time, effort and money on social media, there will be also be increased scrutiny of the return on investment (aka ROI). Companies will want to know what they’re getting out of having social media as part of their communications, sales and marketing mix – be it more sales/leads, better customer service or brand awareness.

In the wake of the growing examination of the effectiveness of social media, Gallup did some research about social media by interviewing 17,000 social media users about a wide range of topics. Among the things Gallup discovered was that “brand-sponsored social media initiatives have very little impact on consumer decision making. Nor do they drive prospective customers to consider trying a brand or recommending a brand to others in their social network.”

Translation: In the scheme of things, social media’s effectiveness to acquire or retain customers ranks low compared with other sources such as spouses, children, parents and friends. (See the chart below).

At first blush, this is a major consideration because Gallup is suggesting that all the time and effort being spent on social media could be for naught because consumers make their decisions based on lots of other things. For any company investing in social media, this is an eye-opening development.

The questions that begged to be asked are:

- Is this an accurate depiction of social media’s effectiveness?

- Does it suggest social media is still relatively immature despite the billions of people using it?

- Is social media more of a soft-sell vehicle so people don’t perceive it as a high-ranking influencer even though it might be?

Whether you want to dismiss or embrace the Gallup study, it makes it clear that it’s still early days for social media. As much as those of actively involved with social media want to believe it is disrupting consumer behaviour, social media is still working its way into the overall landscape. The fact is most people are influenced by other factors, which will continue to play a key role going forward even as social media becomes more entrenched.

What do you think: has Gallup unearthed something significant or does it suggest something else?

 

 

 

Brand Health and Social Media

It is fascinating to see the discussions about social media ROI (return on investment) continues to rage on, probably because ROI  can be measured in so many different ways.

Another factor is that social media has moved beyond being something new and interesting. The companies using social media or thinking about getting into it are starting to apply the same kind of financial scrutiny as they do to other parts of the business. As a result, social media has to justify its existence given doing social media usually means investing less in something else.

In a recent conversation, a friend raised the idea of “brand health”. It struck me as an intriguing idea because brand health seems like a holistic way to assess the impact of social media as opposed to using traditional metrics, or KPIs (key performance indicators) as the geeks like to use.

To me, brand health is a different approach to social media ROI because it is based on the idea over measuring a company’s social media presence from many different angles collectively rather than a bunch of metrics.

In some ways, brand health is the akin a doctor giving you a clean bill of health at the end of a check-up rather than going through the results of tests that have been administered. It’s a high-level assessment that tells a company everything’s alright or, conversely, there are problems that need to be addressed.

The challenge with brand health it is doesn’t provide the granularity that some companies want to measure their social media activities. On the other hand, brand health could make it easier to assess whether social media is working. If the “score” is good, everyone’s happy; if not, it’s back to the drawing board.

Social Media is About Conversation, Not Conversion

With the growing focus on return on investment (ROI), it should not be a surprise many companies could start looking at sales as an increasingly important metric for success.

This, however, would be a mistake because social media is not a hard sales medium. This is not to suggest it can’t be used to encourage sales but social media does not work well if a primary goal is closing deals.

Nevertheless, this may not stop many companies from thinking otherwise because, after all, what’s the use of doing social media if it doesn’t benefit the bottom line.

The reality, at least if you follow best practices, is that social media is about conversation not conversion. Sure, conversation is over-used member of the social media mantra but it’s probably the best way to describe the way social media can be effectively used to start and build relationships with consumers.

Social media is a way for companies to get their foot in the door. It’s a way to make consumers aware of who you are and what you do. If it can capture someone’s attention, there is an opportunity to educate, entertain or engage them with relevant or interesting content. And then there might be a chance to convert them into customers.

In many respects, this process is like dating. It’s impossible to meet someone at a party, and then marry you the next day – unless, of course, you’re partying in Las Vegas. In a normal situation, you meet someone, go on a few dates to get to know them better, and then see where the relationship leads. Maybe you get married in the future, maybe not but it takes time to get there.

When social media works well, it offers a variety of ways to encourage consumers to think differently about a company, and their products and services. It could be how a company answers questions, provides valuable resources, handles customer service, or provide relevant information.

At the end of the day, all these things contribute to convincing a consumer to start thinking about buying a company’s products or services – aka the “soft sell”.

Selling soft doesn’t mean not selling effectively or well. It means being measured and patient when dealing with consumers. It means not looking for the instant sale even when it looks so close you can taste it. Consumers can smell desperation, and the more you try to “hard sell” them the more your chances of doing so start to disappear.

How Much Does Social Media Cost?

One of the hottest topics within social media is ROI (aka return on investment), which has been thrust into the spotlight as corporate bean-counters and marketing executives try to measure and justify how much, if anything, a company is getting from investments in social media.

If ROI is broken down, there are clearly two elements: return (what are the benefits, how many leads or sales are being generated, etc.) and investment (how much money are we spending to operate social media).

Let’s focus on the “I” in ROI.

It is fair to say that most social media tools are free, which is one of the reasons why company, particularly small businesses, like the concept of using social media. But free only goes so far because once social media tools are embraced, you have to spend money.

The biggest cost is people and resources to operate social media programs. While some activity can be automated, people have to make social media happen. They have to create content (tweets, updates, blog posts, videos, etc.), they have monitor activity, and they have to engage with other social media users.

Regardless of whether a company initially uses someone part-time or eventually hires a person or people full-time, an investment has to be made.

Another cost is money spent to customize and enhance the social media tools being used to differentiate them from the crowd.

A Facebook Page, for example, can be transformed into something compelling by having a developer create new tabs, applications, surveys and contests. A blog can capture the imagination of visitors with a great design. Even Twitter’s UI can be customized. Of course, this means spending money.

Finally, there’s the cost to change corporate culture, which is a soft cost rather than something tangible.

To encourage a company to embrace social media and change how it engages with customers and potential customers takes a lot of work, and it has to be driven and led by people within an organization to make sure it becomes part of the corporate DNA. It’s not a cost that can easily be counted but it is an important investment.

Simply put, social media is far from free. In fact, social media can involve significant investment to be successful. . But if it’s done well, the ROI can be significant, which will no doubt make the bean-counters happy.

- Mark Evans

What is Social Media Success?

As social media becomes more of a mainstream fixture, there’s not surprisingly growing discussion about success and how it can be measured.

Within the business world, it’s all about the return on investment, or ROI.

The reality, however, is social media isn’t like other business efforts that can be easily measured because there are hard and soft metrics that can be used to determine success.

The situation is even more complicated by another truism: success can be anything you want it to be.

If the goal is getting the CEO mentioned more often within business blogs, and this happens, then social media can be described as a success.

The same goes for other goals such as a stronger brand, better customer service, higher sales, improved relations with customers, employees and partners, or a bigger digital presence than competitors.

Some of these goals can be easily measured, while others are more abstract. As well, success can be impacted by marketing or sales campaigns happening at the same time. For example, increased sales may be buoyed by social media but also boosted by an aggressive discount campaign.

This means determining social media success can be a challenge, which means calculating ROI can be elusive. At the end of the day, social media success can be determined by taking into account a variety of factors within the context of a company’s overall performance.

If some respects, social media success is a subjective exercise. This will not make the bean counters particularly happy because it doesn’t fit nicely within a spreadsheet, but companies that believe in social media will have faith that social media is contributing to the top and bottom lines.

Measuring Success Starts With Determining Goals

I saw a tweet recently from someone asking how to measure social media success. The insinuation seemed to be that “success” should be a scientific formula based on variables such as the number of blog comments, RSS subscribers, links, retweets, Facebook friends, Diggs, etc.

While all of the above are certainly solid metrics to demonstrate social media activity, they’re just one approach to measuring success – and one that may not even come into play for some companies.

The most important thing in measuring social media success is figuring out your goals and what success looks like.

For some companies, success is straightforward: more sales or, at least, more leads. For others, success is a stronger brand, better customer service or having an equal presence as competitors. And for others, success is feedback and suggestions to improve their products and services.

In other words, success means different things to different companies.

Once a company figures out what success looks like and how it meets their strategic goals, it can begin to use social media as a communications, marketing or sales medium.

As important, it can measure on a regular basis, how its social media programs are faring based on its pre-determined objectives.

At the end of the day, companies can enjoy success without having higher sales, better customer service or valuable feedback from consumers if success doesn’t take into account any of these variables.

How you measure success is a key part of the strategic planning process; the sooner it’s figured out, the sooner you can determine whether your social media efforts or working or not.